Fuller Brush 17027 Electrostatic Carpet and Floor Sweeper review lightweight cleaning solution

Description

Key Features of the Electrostatic Floor Sweeper

Testing the Fuller Brush 17027 Electrostatic Carpet & Floor Sweeper has been an interesting experience. This little cleaning marvel is not your regular vacuum or broom. It’s designed for quick and efficient cleaning, making it perfect for hardwood, tile, laminate, and low-pile carpets. Its 9-inch cleaning path might sound small, but trust me, it packs a punch. One of the first things that stood out is how it works without batteries or electricity. There’s something refreshing about a manual sweeper that relies solely on its intelligent, electrostatic design, which acts like a magnet for dirt, crumbs, and pet hair.

The adjustable handle made reaching under furniture and into tight spaces surprisingly comfortable. I tested it on everything from the living room rug to the kitchen tiles, and it performed consistently well. It’s also incredibly light, weighing just 2.4 pounds, so carrying it from room to room was effortless.

Small but Mighty

Don’t let its compact size fool you. This sweeper is built with an indestructible metal housing that feels durable and reliable in your hands. Unlike bulkier cleaning devices, it folds up quickly and can be tucked away in a closet or even under the bed. It’s the kind of tool you pull out for quick clean-ups without having to drag out a full-sized vacuum.

What really surprised me was the dual dust bin system. Emptying it is as simple as pressing the ends, and everything just falls out—no mess, no fuss. Plus, they’ve included a special cleaning comb to deal with any hair stuck on the bristle brushes. I found this particularly useful after using it in the bathroom, where hair just magically appears on the floor.

Key Benefits

Here are some winning points of this product:

• No batteries or power outlets required, making it eco-friendly and always ready to use.
• The lightweight design makes it easy to carry and store.
• Compact size means it fits into tight spaces and can be stored almost anywhere.
• Electrostatic functionality ensures quick pickup of dirt, dust, and pet hair.

Areas for Improvement

Despite its impressive features, there are a few areas of concern worth noting:

• It’s not ideal for thicker carpets or rugs, as it struggles to pick up debris effectively.
• The 9-inch cleaning path might feel too narrow for larger areas, requiring multiple passes.
• While great for touch-ups, it can’t replace a full vacuum for deep cleaning needs.

Product Competitors

I’ve also used similar products, like the Bissell Natural Sweep and the Casabella Floor Sweeper. Compared to the Fuller Brush model, these alternatives have their own perks but fall short in some areas. The Bissell Natural Sweep offers a bit wider cleaning path but isn’t as lightweight or compact. Meanwhile, the Casabella Floor Sweeper looks sleek but lacks the dual dustbin convenience and indestructible build that the Fuller Brush sweeper boasts.

Where the Fuller Brush excels is in its ease of use and portability. It’s perfect for quick touch-ups, whereas some competitors feel bulkier or less effective when it comes to picking up the finer debris. However, if you need something for thick carpets, you might want to look elsewhere, as most manual sweepers struggle in that area.

Price to Quality Ratio

In terms of value for money, this sweeper delivers a solid performance. You’re not paying for unnecessary features like motorized parts or rechargeable batteries, which keeps the price reasonable. For someone who values practicality and durability, the investment feels justified. It’s not the cheapest cleaning tool out there, but it’s certainly one of the most efficient and reliable in its category.

Considering the 114 years of expertise from Fuller Brush, it’s evident that this product is built to last. The three-year warranty is another reassuring factor, ensuring you’re covered should anything go wrong. For a manual sweeper, it strikes a good balance between cost-effectiveness and reliability.

Additional information